Doctors want pets banned from airplane cabins



Doctors want pets banned from airplane cabins.

Doctors want pets banned from airplane cabins.

Published on August 24, 2011
Published on August 24, 2011
Postmedia News  RSS Feed
Topics :
CMA , World Health Organization , Air Canada , California , ST. JOHN'S , Canada

ST. JOHN'S — Plane cabins should be as pet-free as they are peanut-free, says Canada's leading doctor's group.

The Canadian Medical Association voted in favour Tuesday of supporting a ban on all pets, except for certified service animals such as guide dogs, travelling inside aircraft cabins on all Canadian passenger planes.

B.C. physician Mark Schonfeld says current federal regulations allowing major national airlines to accept pets in cabins are posing serious threats to people allergic to animals.

Cats and small dogs are the animals most likely to be found onboard, though some airlines allow birds and rabbits as well.

"While airlines argue that this is a great convenience for pet owners, the practice actually exposes our patients, and their passengers, to significant allergens that can make the journey very difficult — and occasionally quite seriously ill as a result," Schonfeld said Tuesday at the doctors' group's annual assembly in St. John's.

"People have to travel with EpiPens, adrenalin, bronchodilators and antibiotics. Some people end up having their entire holidays ruined."

Schonfeld said allergies to pet allergens are now classified by the World Health Organization as a disability.

He said pet allergies are triggered by animal dander, saliva, sebum and fur. "These allergens are constantly shed into the air," he said, where they cling to seats, carpets and aisles and are spread by air circulating systems.

Passengers with severe allergies can end up with serious allergic reactions; some end up needing treatment in an intensive care.

Delegates voted 93 per cent in favour of the motion.

One Vancouver doctor said he travelled recently with a dog under his airplane seat. "My wife, by the end of two hours, was so asthmatic I had to take her to an emergency (room) in California," he told the assembled delegates. "It makes no sense that we have let this happen because people want to take their pets," he said. Pets can be carried in a pressurized hold in the cargo bay, he said "They should not be up where it risks people's lives."

One doctor whose family has peanut allergies — as well as cat and dog allergies — said it wasn't the CMA's place to be decreeing what should or should not be permitted on planes, or any other mode of public travel for that matter.

But outgoing CMA president Dr. Jeff Turnbull said that it is entirely the organization's role and responsibility "to speak out for the health of Canadians."

For people with severe allergies to animals, it's an issue of personal safety, he said. "This is not an issue of convenience. This is an issue of the health of Canadians."

Air Canada reversed its prohibition against allowing pets on board in 2009 because of competition from WestJet, which, according to an editorial published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, has pets on about one-quarter of its flights.

The editorial said 10 per cent of Canadians suffer from a pet allergy and should not be forced to subject themselves to an enclosed space filled with animal dander.

"Although uncommon, severe allergic reactions . . . are serious under the best of circumstances," the editorial said. "On an airplane at high altitude and isolated from the access to emergency medical care, the consequences can be much more dangerous."

Comments

  • Username
    Rob Miller
    - September 26, 2011 at 09:44:07

    Get the pets off the flights. Make the passengers check the pets and put them with the cargo. I took a flight from Beijing to Toronto, and this Chinese woman refused to comply with regulations and keep her dog in the carry case. She sat behind me and my son. My son is allergic and became ill. Not only that, the 14-hour flight was a constant argument between the woman and flight staff, which made it unbearable. Pets should not be allowed in the cabins.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Anna
    - September 24, 2011 at 09:34:19

    I have a ten pound hypoallergenic dog - he flies with me all the time. He has hair, not fur so allergies are not an issue. The solution here is simple, offer both pet friendly and pet free flights. Then everyone is accomodated.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    doug ellis
    - September 23, 2011 at 09:28:02

    We recently adopted our second dog and it had to be shipped in from NY because of the distance to our home. It came through a qualified pet carrier company and was provided for as much as it would have if I had travelled with it myself. I do not suffer from any issues related to pets, but in all honesty, if a plane has laws about peanuts, why the heck are pets any different. These pets can be shipped very comfortably and I believe the only anxiety issues relating to pets during travel is the need for the owner to watch over the pet to make themselves feel as though they are taking proper care.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Kathleen
    - September 14, 2011 at 15:39:14

    I have two cats and we have just moved back from Calgary to Ottawa. We had our cats on the plane under the seat in their travel carriers and they did not meow like crazy as they were too scared to even move. I am thankful I was able to keep an eye on them as they are our life and joy(no kids yet). I do understand the seriousness of having the animals on board for others who are allegic...in their position its not fair. I wouldnt bring my cats on vacations with me, I would leave them with someone who can care for them , so for those who travel with their animals for vacations, just because of seperation, need to honestly train them to realize that they are not always going to be home..do you bring your pets to work too then? I do not, however, feel too comfortable having them in cargo, so mabe if the airlines could have a way where we can have system that we can see them, or have someone travel below with the animals that we can meet while checking in to so we can feel comfortable and rest assured our ani9mals are being cared for and watched while flying, it would make it easier for me to want to put them in cargo... It shall be interesting to see how this comes out as Im sitting on the fence on this topic....

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Sandra Boswell
    - September 9, 2011 at 00:26:22

    Great discussion. I have been on the receiving end of pets on a plane. Asthma is not pretty. Reaching for the next breath can be terrifying. Breaking out in hives, having your throat swell up and your tongue is not pretty either. Any time anyone's life is threatened by an allergen, asthma or a sensitivity is critical. Medical help is required immediately. Why do people expect the allergic person to dope up when the problem can be solved by NOT ALLOWING PETS ON A PLANE! People are more obsessed with their pets now than they are with their children, kin folk and friends. I think there is some psychological wrong with people who will place a person's health behind those self absorbed needs to carry their pets with them whereever they go. And WHY do we need seeing eye dogs on a plane. I believe the staff of the airlines can correctly direct people to the bathroom. The seeing and hearing dog thing has gone overboard. Getting rid of all that dander that flies through the air and attaches to everything and one onboard is HARMFUL to some peoples health. What if a person had cancer and immune system that could not take pet allergen and perfumes, would the pet owner still insist on taking their pet on board. If so, they need therapy, NOW. People get a grip. Hire a sitter for your pets.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      John Malone
      - September 12, 2011 at 19:53:34

      I bet you dont own a pet. Thank god as the poor pet would want to run away with just the taught of living with a person like your self. Get a life but not a pet.

  • Username
    Sandra Boswell
    - September 9, 2011 at 00:25:41

    Maybe the airline companies could make an agreement with pet owners. If their pets cause allergies, asthma, chemical sensitivity or anaphylaxis (which can result in death) then the pet owner would have to pay for the patients medications, emergency procedures, including emergency landing of a plane, reward the person who had the mild, severe allergic attack or asthma for time missed from work, ER treatment, Hospitalization of the patient and any other costs involved. If pet owners are not willing to pay these bills, which would amount to millions and millions of dollars, world wide-billions perhaps. Then maybe they should leave their pets at home. Be sane and responsible animal owner.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Whatever
    - August 30, 2011 at 10:26:26

    What are we going to ban next. How can we sanitize our lives any further. Your still going to come into contact with pet dander on people clothes. Lets just wrap everything in society in plastic. Would you all feel better if we did that.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    petlover
    - August 30, 2011 at 09:11:47

    In a world where my kids arent allowed to take bananas, peanuts, anything that may have come in contact with a nut, strawberries and kiwi or anything that isnt processed to death to school then i can honestly say that its about time to take pets out of the seating areas of planes. For someone to think that we shoudl all dope up because of our allergies anytime we travel because someone might need to take their cat on a ski trip is insane. I travelled with my dog from Toronto and at the time Air Canada wouldnt allow pets on the flight so she flew Cargo as a dog should - not sure when that changed back but it should be across the board that there are no cats in your lap during a flight. If you dog has separation anxiety then stay home with it! The other effect for other travellers is to sit next to cats who arent use to being kennelled and listening to it meow endlessly for 3 hours. Maybe if you put your dog in a kennel for a week with other dogs it might learn it is a dog and it doesnt get to go on vacation once a year.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Tracy Nuttall
    - August 26, 2011 at 21:55:43

    I believe the air in the cargo hold is he same air that is circulated throughout the cabin thus the benefit of putting the pet in cargo is questionable. For those with allergies, they are probably facing the same risk sitting next to a pet owner with dander on their clothing as they are sitting next to a small animal enclosed in an onboard kennel. And those with chemical sensitivities likely face considerable risk sitting next to a liberally perfumed/cologned passenger. Westjet does claim to have enhanced its air circulation system via hepa filtering and apparently the air exchange occur every two to three minutes.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Matt
    - August 25, 2011 at 15:13:21

    I have a rather large dog who suffers from separation anxiety from being away from me for long periods of time, I know how tough it can be to leave your companion for extended periods of time as my dog is my pride and joy, BUT at the risk of somebody's health I absolutely agree with not having pets that aren't necessary on board a plane.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    GUMMIE BEAR
    - August 24, 2011 at 22:08:26

    I agree with John Baltic...while you'll find no bigger animal lover than myself,I get so pissed at those arrogant pet owers (you know who you are) who think all should bow to their precious - Precious.BTW to my neighbour with the yappie toy whatever,for once in your life have a touch of consideration for your neighbours and take the dog inside after it barks for 45 minutes while at your backdoor patio which is also next to our backyards.The animal is telling you he now wants to COME INSIDE !

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Nancy
      - August 25, 2011 at 15:11:21

      When they stop mishandling them and even worse LOOSING far too many pets in cargo maybe I would consider letting my family member (because that's what our pets are) fly cargo. And anyway you've no idea what you're already flying with. My husband was on a flight to the UK when the flight attendant drew back the curtain and showed him a cow and it's cal mere feet away from the passengers.

    • Username
      Sleepless
      - September 16, 2011 at 10:13:49

      I agree with Gummie Bear & Ad Hoc. While I can understand how much people love their pets, they also need to as considerate as they expect others to be! We have 7 new owners on our block and all have at least one dog. Once one starts barking, seems like all dogs within hearing distance join in. It is making life very miserable!

  • Username
    Ad hoc
    - August 24, 2011 at 22:08:07

    Oh, how I reminisce about the good old days of growing up in the country! Dogs, were dogs, cats were cats, people were people, and they all knew their place.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    AD
    - August 24, 2011 at 22:07:58

    This is not a like or dislike issue; you can't simply sit in another area of the plane and avoid pet dander. The cabin air is re-circulated and any air pollutants are forced out to everyone sharing the air. This is a public health issue and if the life of a child or adult is threatened by pet dander, it makes no sense. Fussy kids on a flight can be annoying but aren't harmful; pet dander on the other hand can pose a serious health risk. If you can't handle your pet being in cargo, leave them with a friend or neighbour or drop-off centre.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Jessica Rabbit
    - August 24, 2011 at 22:07:38

    I have 2 very small dogs that have traveled with me across Canada several times. They're quiet and very well behaved, most of the time people have no idea they're even on the plane. Some dogs, mine for example, are too small to travel in cargo. And with the amount of animals getting hurt or worse when they're "shipped" that way, why would I EVER transport my dogs in that manner? 10 percent of the population is affected by pet allergies, so pets shouldn’t be able to travel in the cabin, therefore making it very difficult for pet owners to travel. What about those with scent allergies, I belong in that category, who are subject to sit beside an individual who showered in perfume or cologne before a flight? Its just something I’m prepared for when I travel now, I take allergy medication and extra Advil in case I’m put in that situation. I’m sure those with bad allergies are used to taking the same precautions when traveling.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Nicole
    - August 24, 2011 at 17:03:13

    I would never put my pet in cargo, never. The onus of responsibility should be on those with the allergies or sensitivities to wear dust/safety masks. These should be provided by the airlines for anyone wishing to wear it for any reason [a passenger nearby could be sneezing, coughing or (yuck) smell real bad!]. btw, what happens when you have a service dog and a person with allergies on the same flight? who gets booted off?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Melanie
    - August 24, 2011 at 17:02:57

    Perhaps when someone books a flight they should be asked whether or not they have any animal allergies, then the airline can book people travelling with pets accordingly.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    designer dawg
    - August 24, 2011 at 17:02:19

    they are everywhere !!! i like those fake seeing eye dogs you know the ones that sit on the drivers lap while they both try to aim the vehicle

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    dogs everywhere
    - August 24, 2011 at 17:02:10

    they are everywhere if you can't see them -you can hear them -if you cant see or hear them, you are stepping around what some proud dogowner didn't pick up dogs are great -- but--- outside inside they rank right up there with second hand smoke Sure you can love your dog but keep it to your self -- not everyone is enchanted with these animals

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    John Baltic
    - August 24, 2011 at 17:01:50

    Here, hear. This isn't rocket science. I resent people taking their stupid pocket pets not only on all forms public transportation but also into stores, restaurants and such. These animals may be cute but they have their place and it certainly isn't anywhere public where people with allergies or fears may be inconvenienced. Be it a cat, dog or rat - they affect people with allergies the same way as do peanuts, perfumes and such.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    IrritatedSL
    - August 24, 2011 at 15:59:16

    Why not make planes that allow or dissallow pets? Have designated planes that allow them or vice versa. This accomadates everyone.. to just allow or dissallow are both contradicting ideas.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The nor'wester is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

loading...

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

nor’wester Twitter

Recent Announcements

Current Obituaries in The nor'wester

Find an Announcement

Find an Announcement

Advertising